United States v. Rafael Noriega-Milln, A/K/A Rafi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[Compliance with Rule ll’s procedures enables the district court to determine for itself the voluntariness of the plea” during post-conviction proceedings (citation omitted)
• indicating that a criminal defendant seeking to withdraw his guilty plea for -4- the first time on direct appeal would have to show a \substantial defect in the Rule 11 proceeding\
• “[W]e cannot set aside a plea where the appellant has suffered no concrete prejudice other than entering a plea he now regrets.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).