United States v. Ortiz-Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his right to appeal when defendant was not “informed ... of the ramifications of the waiver”
• concluding that “Rule 32(i)(1)(A)’s mandate was not satisfied” notwithstanding the court’s interpretation of “a prior iteration of the Rule”
• holding that defendant did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his right to appeal when defendant was not “informed . . . of the ramifications of the waiver”
• explaining that the maximum penalty for an offense under 18 ■ U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) is life imprisonment and is derived from case law
• explaining that the maximum penalty for an offense under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) is life imprisonment and is derived from case law
• explaining that the maximum penalty for an offense under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) 1 After setting out the mandatory minimum and statutory maximum penalties on Count One, the judge (somewhat unclearly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).