Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 4/1/2021

United States v. Ryan Kibble

Citations

  • 992 F.3d 326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court incorrectly ruled that USSG § 1B1.13 was “applicable” to defendant-filed motion for compassionate release
  • noting that district court has discretion to appoint counsel in proceedings under § 3582(c) if interests of justice so require
  • noting that a district court abuses its discretion when it relies on erroneous factual or legal premises
  • noting that reliance on an erroneous factual premise is an abuse of discretion in compassionate release proceedings
  • affirming denial of compassionate release where “[t]he court’s rationale . . . was both rational and legitimate under [18 U.S.C. § 3553(a
  • affirming district court order denying compassionate release where “[t]he court’s rationale . . . was both rational and legitimate under [18 U.S.C. § 3553(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.