Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 4/18/2024

United States v. Antonio Davis

Citations

  • 99 F.4th 647

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the district court \abused its discretion in overlooking [the defendant's] evidence of rehabilitation\ when considering whether the defendant established an extraordinary and compelling reason for compassionate release
  • explaining that our cases requiring “an individualized explanation” turned on “the nature and volume of evidence presented by appellants”
  • explaining that district court abuses its discretion when it “relies on erroneous factual . . . premises” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • explaining that the Sentencing Commission “promulgated amendments to U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13” in May 2023
  • stating standard of review, addressing determinations district court must make to grant relief, and addressing parameters governing district court’s consideration of factors raised for relief
  • stating standard of review, addressing determinations district court must make to grant relief, and addressing parameters governing district court’s consideration of factors raised for relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Antonio Davis

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.