Sixth Circuit· 6/25/1992

United States v. Russell E. Hill

Citations

967 F.2d 226
1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14487
1992 WL 140968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a bank teller’s in-court identification was reliable even though five years had passed since the bank robbery
finding that in-court identification of robber was reliable, even though five years had passed between the incident and trial
finding lapse of five years did not operate to bar identification supported by other indicia of reliability
assuming for purposes of the motion that the in-court identification of the defendant was impermissibly suggestive where the witness had not identified defendant before trial and defendant was seated at counsel table
finding “a couple of minutes” a sufficient opportunity to view the suspect
finding “a couple of minutes” a sufficient opportunity to view the suspect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Boggs, Wellford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.