United States v. Russell E. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a bank teller’s in-court identification was reliable even though five years had passed since the bank robbery
• finding that in-court identification of robber was reliable, even though five years had passed between the incident and trial
• finding lapse of five years did not operate to bar identification supported by other indicia of reliability
• assuming for purposes of the motion that the in-court identification of the defendant was impermissibly suggestive where the witness had not identified defendant before trial and defendant was seated at counsel table
• finding “a couple of minutes” a sufficient opportunity to view the suspect
• finding “a couple of minutes” a sufficient opportunity to view the suspect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).