· 10/23/1995
United States v. David Kwong, Also Known as George Kwong, Also Known as Ken Chan, and Also Known as Zura Kwong
Citations
- 69 F.3d 663
- 42 Fed. R. Serv. 1150
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the polygraph results were excludable under ER 403
- finding that ambiguous questions made the results inaccurate and created “a substantial possibility that the admission of the polygraph results would mislead and confuse the jury”
- upholding a district court's determination that the results of a defective polygraph exam were inadmissible under Rule 403
- polygraph results inadmissible because “the questions posed to Kwong were inherently ambiguous no matter how they were answered”
- “ft]he record before us simply does not provide the proper opportunity to explore the validity of polygraph evidence”
- polygraph results inadmissible because \the questions posed to Kwong were inherently ambiguous no matter how they were answered\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Altimari, McLAUGHLIN, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.