Skip to main content
· 10/23/1995

United States v. David Kwong, Also Known as George Kwong, Also Known as Ken Chan, and Also Known as Zura Kwong

Citations

  • 69 F.3d 663
  • 42 Fed. R. Serv. 1150
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the polygraph results were excludable under ER 403
  • finding that ambiguous questions made the results inaccurate and created “a substantial possibility that the admission of the polygraph results would mislead and confuse the jury”
  • upholding a district court's determination that the results of a defective polygraph exam were inadmissible under Rule 403
  • polygraph results inadmissible because “the questions posed to Kwong were inherently ambiguous no matter how they were answered”
  • “ft]he record before us simply does not provide the proper opportunity to explore the validity of polygraph evidence”
  • polygraph results inadmissible because \the questions posed to Kwong were inherently ambiguous no matter how they were answered\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altimari, McLAUGHLIN, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.