United States Court of Military Appeals· 9/28/1990
United States v. Rushatz
Citations
- 31 M.J. 450
- 1990 CMA LEXIS 1996
- 1990 WL 182440
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Giving a curative instruction, rather than declaring a mistrial, is the preferred remedy for curing error when court members have heard inadmissible evidence, as long as the curative instruction avoids prejudice to the accused.”
- “Giving a curative instruction, rather than declaring a mistrial, is the preferred remedy for curing error when court members have heard inadmissible evidence, as long as the curative instruction avoids prejudice to the accused.”
- “Giving a curative instruction, rather than declaring a mistrial, is the preferred remedy for curing error when court members have heard inadmissible evidence, as long as the curative instruction avoids prejudice to the accused.”
- “Giving a curative instruction, rather than declaring a mistrial, is the preferred remedy for curing error when court members have heard inadmissible evidence, as long as the curative instruction avoids prejudice to the accused.”
- “a lawyer cannot prosecute his former client in the same or a related matter, even though while acting for that former client he gained no knowledge which could be used to adversely affect the former client in a subsequent proceeding”
- “a lawyer cannot prosecute his former client in the same or a related matter, even though while acting for that former client he gained no knowledge which could be used to adversely affect the former client in a subsequent proceeding”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cox, Everett, Sentelle, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. HumpherysCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2002-07-23· cited 320×
- United States v. MeekCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1996-04-04· cited 136×
- United States v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1999-05-28· cited 105×
- United States v. AshbyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2009-08-31· cited 97×
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2003-09-17· cited 62×
- United States v. HughesAir Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 1998-05-29· cited 39×
- United States v. ThompkinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2003-01-28· cited 32×
- United States v. LovingU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1992-02-03· cited 31×
- United States v. HamiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1994-09-23· cited 31×
- United States v. DancyUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1993-09-27· cited 30×
- United States v. BarronCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1999-09-27· cited 19×
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1999-08-02· cited 18×
- United States v. ThomasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 1995-06-23· cited 16×
- United States v. GolstonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2000-05-25· cited 9×
- United States v. BalagnaUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1991-09-03· cited 9×
- United States v. SkerrettUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1994-09-16· cited 9×
- United States v. AndreozziArmy Court of Criminal Appeals· 2004-11-04· cited 7×
- United States v. MobleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1991-12-19· cited 7×
- United States v. HeimerU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1991-12-20· cited 6×
- United States v. BridgesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals· 2003-03-06· cited 6×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court· 1981-02-23· cited 1,159×
- Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court· 1978-03-22· cited 380×
- United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1989-09-25· cited 226×
- In Re Sealed CaseD.C. Circuit· 1989-06-27· cited 176×
- United States v. HarperUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1986-06-02· cited 158×
- United States v. RosserUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1979-03-26· cited 125×
- United States v. JeanbaptisteUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1978-09-25· cited 55×
- United States v. RickettsUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1975-07-18· cited 51×
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum (Ed Marger) (Dennis Merenbach). Robert Kent Lahodny, Movant-Appellant v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1982-12-21· cited 38×
- United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1955-04-15· cited 38×
- United States v. MorrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1982-07-06· cited 30×
- Von Marschner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-01-09· cited 23×
- United States v. EvansUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1988-09-28· cited 20×
- United States v. PastorUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1980-04-21· cited 19×
- United States v. StubbsUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1987-01-12· cited 17×
- Arthur v. Donaldson v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1957-12-04· cited 15×
- United States v. McKeeU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1976-09-20· cited 5×
- United States v. RushatzU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1990-02-20· cited 5×
- Nichols v. McGeeSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 5×
Other cases named United States v. Rushatz
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.