Skip to main content
· 12/21/1982

In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum (Ed Marger) (Dennis Merenbach). Robert Kent Lahodny, Movant-Appellant v. United States

Citations

  • 695 F.2d 363
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 23135
  • 12 Fed. R. Serv. 337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing under Perlman but concluding attorney-client privilege did not protect information on fee arrangements
  • “an immediate appeal is proper when the subpoena is directed to a third party, here the appellant’s attorney, because that party will not be expected to risk a contempt citation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcon, Poole, Pregerson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.