· 12/21/1982
In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum (Ed Marger) (Dennis Merenbach). Robert Kent Lahodny, Movant-Appellant v. United States
Citations
- 695 F.2d 363
- 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 23135
- 12 Fed. R. Serv. 337
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing under Perlman but concluding attorney-client privilege did not protect information on fee arrangements
- “an immediate appeal is proper when the subpoena is directed to a third party, here the appellant’s attorney, because that party will not be expected to risk a contempt citation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarcon, Poole, Pregerson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.