Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1/28/2003
United States v. Thompkins
Citations
- 58 M.J. 43
- 2003 CAAF LEXIS 113
- 2003 WL 183787
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[t]he ameliorative actions of the military judge . . . secured the fairness and impartiality of the trial” where the military judge engaged in 15 United States v. Hornback, No. 13-0442/MC timely remedial actions including curative instructions to members
- “absent evidence to the contrary, court members are presumed to comply with the military judge's 4 Voir dire occurred on August 17, 1998. The instructions were read to the members on August 22, 1989. 11 United States v. Forbes, No. 04-5005/NA instructions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crawford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. HornbackCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2014-03-06· cited 91×
- United States v. Rodriguez-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-08-09· cited 78×
- United States v. MullinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2010-06-28· cited 58×
- United States v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2015-03-03· cited 32×
- United States v. ForbesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2005-08-25· cited 29×
- United States v. EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-08-09· cited 18×
- United States v. BassNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2015-08-18· cited 13×
- United States v. QuintanillaNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2005-01-31· cited 5×
- United States v. Rodriguez-RiveraNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2005-01-10· cited 3×
- United States v. BassNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2015-05-27· cited 2×
- United States v. HarrisNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2008-07-31· cited 2×
- United States v. RodriguezNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2017-01-30
- United States v. HutchinsNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2018-01-29
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1987-12-18· cited 1,446×
- Tennessee v. StreetSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 713×
- Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court· 1978-03-22· cited 380×
- United States v. MeekCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1996-04-04· cited 136×
- United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1991-09-30· cited 109×
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2000-07-19· cited 108×
- United States v. RushatzUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1990-09-28· cited 66×
- United States v. DancyUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1993-09-27· cited 30×
- United States v. WaldronUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1966-01-28· cited 25×
- United States v. BarronCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1999-09-27· cited 19×
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1999-08-02· cited 18×
- United States v. DonleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1991-09-03· cited 6×
Other cases named United States v. Thompkins
9 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- United States v. ThompkinsU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1976-02-04· cited 3×
- United States v. ThompkinsS.D. New York· 1975-11-17· cited 1×
- United States v. ThompkinsFifth Circuit· 1976-08-11
- United States v. ThompkinsNinth Circuit· 1984-05-29
- United States v. ThompkinsEleventh Circuit· 1998-09-04
- United States v. ThompkinsS.D. New York· 1975-12-23
- United States v. ThompkinsFourth Circuit· 2012-08-28
- United States v. ThompkinsSecond Circuit· 2008-07-30
- United States v. ThompkinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia· 1812-06-15
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.