United States v. Rullan Rivera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding the case “for further proceedings evaluating the credibility of 19 [the claimant’s] subjective complaints . . .”
• a medical opinion indicating the claimant can perform some work 21 may undermine claim of disabling limitations
• absence of treatment for back pain during 19] half of the alleged disability period, and evidence of only “conservative treatment” when the claimant finally sought treatment, sufficient to discount claimant’s testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).