United States v. John Tejeda, United States of America v. Paul Christian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that jurors may evaluate evidence in light of \their experience as to the natural inclinations of human beings\
• noting that jurors may evaluate evidence in light of \their experience as to the natural inclinations of human beings\
• indicating that informant's actions initiating most of calls and \diligently pursu[ing]\ drug transaction does not establish \persistent badgering\ or inducement
• highlighting evidence of familiarity with “drug trade lingo” and knowledge of the going rate of cocaine
• finding no abuse in trial judge's Rule 403 balancing, \particularly in light of the careful limiting instruction given by the district court\
• highlighting evidence of familiarity with \drug trade lingo\ and knowledge of the going rate of cocaine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).