Skip to main content
· 10/7/2004

United States v. Ropp

Citations

  • 347 F. Supp. 2d 831
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27233
  • 2004 WL 2823039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing wiretap claim because a keylogging software intercepted signals between keyboard and computer's processing unit, not electronic communications transmitted by a system that affects interstate commerce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feess

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.