Skip to main content
· 1/14/2003

United States v. Bradley Joseph Steiger

Citations

  • 318 F.3d 1039
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Section 2701(a) does not apply to the act of hacking into a personal computer to download information stored on the hard drive
  • holding that under Steve Jackson Games, the acquisition must take place during “flight”
  • noting that “the SCA may apply [in this case] to the extent the source accessed and retrieved any information stored with Steiger’s Internet service provider”
  • finding that electronic communications are not subject to suppression for a non-constitutional violation under Title III
  • finding that electronic communications are not subject to suppression for a non-constitutional violation under Title III
  • finding that the SCA does not apply to the act of hacking into a personal computer to download information stored on the hard drive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Marcus, Goodwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.