Skip to main content
· 11/25/1970

United States v. Roberto Power Benthien

Citations

  • 434 F.2d 1031
  • 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declaring that reinstating an appeal whenever a trial court has not complied with Criminal Rule 32(a)(2) “insures that all defendants will receive the protection the rule was intended to provide” and “serve[s] to warn district judges of the necessity of strict compliance”
  • held remanded even though defendant’s attorney had advised him of his appellate rights
  • entering judgment restoring defendant’s right to appeal the sentence
  • notification by counsel after sentencing insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldrich, Mc-Entee, Coffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.