Albert Allen Paige v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting government’s argument that defendant had actual knowledge of right to appeal, even though the court had not formally informed -him of his right to appeal
• noting a Criminal Rule 32 violation “requires a remand for resentencing and reinstatement of the right to appeal”
• insufficient notification of appeal rights at sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).