Skip to main content
· 12/18/1970

Kenneth T. Dunham v. Philip B. Crosby, Jr.

Citations

  • 435 F.2d 1177
  • 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that when plaintiff sought to recover from school board members - 24 - individually, defendants could not assert a counterclaim that arose out of the plaintiff's alleged obligation to the board as a unit
  • school superintendent’s active discouragement of use of employee appeal procedure by teacher and personal initiation of extra-statutory procedures held to bar superintendent’s reliance on exhaustion.
  • observing the same rule in dicta

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldrich, Mc-Entee, Coffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.