Second Circuit· 9/11/2017
United States v. Roberto Pabon
Citations
- 871 F.3d 164
- 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 17471
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that although “Marin–Buitrago 3 1 dealt with the standards for issuance of a search warrant, the same logic applies in evaluating 2 whether probable cause exists for a warrantless arrest”
- discussing unreasonable delay under the Fourth Amendment primarily pertains to delays following an arrest, not prior
- discussing unreasonable delay under the Fourth Amendment primarily pertains to delays following an arrest, not prior
- finding it unnecessary to decide whether an officer may, in an extreme case, be required to release a detainee arrested without a warrant where probable cause has unequivocally dissipated, rendering further detention unreasonable
- “Neither the Supreme Court nor this Court has yet determined whether a violation of McLaughlin’s 48–hour rule is an appropriate basis for suppression.”
- “[I]n reviewing the district court’s decision, we apply familiar standards governing clear error review, without viewing the evidence in either party’s favor.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cabranes, Livingston, Pauley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hernandez v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2019-09-17· cited 197×
- Caffee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-05-07· cited 48×
- United States v. Taj WilliamsSecond Circuit· 2019-11-22· cited 5×
- United States v. HagoodSecond Circuit· 2023-08-30· cited 2×
- United States v. PollerSecond Circuit· 2025-02-20· cited 2×
- Crescenzi v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2019-10-03
- Vasquez v. County of Will, IllinoisDistrict of Columbia· 2021-09-30
- United States v. PenaS.D. Illinois· 2019-01-11
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 5,659×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court· 2006-05-22· cited 2,237×
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court· 2003-12-15· cited 1,610×
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,546×
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court· 2016-06-23· cited 1,440×
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court· 2006-06-15· cited 1,222×
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,151×
- Manuel v. City of JolietSupreme Court· 2017-03-21· cited 1,069×
- Florida v. HarrisSupreme Court· 2013-02-19· cited 782×
- Winston v. LeeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 733×
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 588×
- Walczyk v. RioSecond Circuit· 2007-08-01· cited 426×
- Sylvia Panetta v. Thomas M. Crowley, Marc Jurnove, Patricia A. Kelvasa, John Doe I, Docket No. 02-7275-CvSecond Circuit· 2006-08-18· cited 400×
- Jocks v. TavernierSecond Circuit· 2003-01-08· cited 398×
- Gonzalez v. City of SchenectadySecond Circuit· 2013-08-28· cited 346×
- Lowth v. Town Of CheektowagaSecond Circuit· 1996-05-21· cited 231×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.