United States v. Roberto Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Sentencing Guidelines and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(e) mandate that appellate court apply a clearly erroneous standard when reviewing denial of acceptance of responsibility adjustment
• basing decision on defendant's conduct at trial, not on his decision to go to trial
• because of its unique position, the sentencing court’s determination of this issue is entitled to great deference
• defendant who enters a guilty plea is not entitled to a sentencing reduction as a matter of right
• determination whether defendant's acceptance of responsibility sufficiently timely to merit additional downward adjustment under section 3E1.1(b)(2
• upholding the constitutionality of U.S.S.G. §3E1.1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).