Ninth Circuit· 3/7/1990

United States v. Roberto Gonzalez

Citations

897 F.2d 1018
1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3143
1990 WL 19961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the Sentencing Guidelines and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(e) mandate that appellate court apply a clearly erroneous standard when reviewing denial of acceptance of responsibility adjustment
basing decision on defendant's conduct at trial, not on his decision to go to trial
because of its unique position, the sentencing court’s determination of this issue is entitled to great deference
defendant who enters a guilty plea is not entitled to a sentencing reduction as a matter of right
determination whether defendant's acceptance of responsibility sufficiently timely to merit additional downward adjustment under section 3E1.1(b)(2
upholding the constitutionality of U.S.S.G. §3E1.1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Schroeder, O'Scannlain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Roberto Gonzalez

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.