Skip to main content
· 7/30/1986

United States v. Priscilla Hull

Citations

  • 792 F.2d 941

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming revocation of probation where probationer “did not express remorse” and stating that “a sentencing court [may] impose a harsh sentence as a penalty for the defendant’s refusal to admit his guilt, since an admission would evidence the first step in rehabilitation”
  • “Hull had ‘a very fine attorney’ and ... her lack of confidence in him flowed from her lack of knowledge of legal proceedings”
  • \Hull had 'a very fine attorney' and ... her lack of confidence in him flowed from her lack of knowledge of legal proceedings\
  • denial of probation because defendant did not express remorse did not punish her for exercising her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination
  • court could deny probation because defendant did not express remorse
  • trial evidence of other thefts corroborated allegations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Kennedy, Beezer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.