· 7/30/1986
United States v. Priscilla Hull
Citations
- 792 F.2d 941
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming revocation of probation where probationer “did not express remorse” and stating that “a sentencing court [may] impose a harsh sentence as a penalty for the defendant’s refusal to admit his guilt, since an admission would evidence the first step in rehabilitation”
- “Hull had ‘a very fine attorney’ and ... her lack of confidence in him flowed from her lack of knowledge of legal proceedings”
- \Hull had 'a very fine attorney' and ... her lack of confidence in him flowed from her lack of knowledge of legal proceedings\
- denial of probation because defendant did not express remorse did not punish her for exercising her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination
- court could deny probation because defendant did not express remorse
- trial evidence of other thefts corroborated allegations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning, Kennedy, Beezer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.