Skip to main content
· 1/28/1994

United States v. Antonio McKinney

Citations

  • 15 F.3d 849
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 628
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 1123
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1347
  • 1994 WL 20672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that adjustment for acceptance of responsibility is appropriate where the district court rebuffed a defendant’s attempts to plead guilty
  • stating that the defendant was eligible for a reduction even though he pled not guilty to a conspiracy charge because he accepted responsibility for his own conduct
  • “[T]he reduction is also available ... [where] the defendant manifests genuine contrition for his acts but nonetheless contests his factual guilt at trial.”
  • adjustment under rare situation exception available to defendant who confessed, assisted authorities and attempted to plead guilty but was rebuffed by government
  • “[I]n appropriate circumstances the reduction is ... available in cases in which the defendant manifests genuine contrition for his acts but nonetheless contests his factual guilt at trial.”
  • reduction appropriate where defendant confessed upon arrest, attempted to plead guilty, was confused about plea status, and put on token defense at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, Nelson, Kaufman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.