United States v. Robert William Schultz, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding cross-examination proper with respect to defendant’s prior, arguably inconsistent statement
• stating “[t]he prosecutor is free to comment on the failure of a defendant to call an available alibi witness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).