United States v. Jeffrey Earl Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant's presence was not required at suppression hearing where sole legal question was whether photographic array was unduly suggestive
• holding that \an accused person has a right to be present at every critical stage of a criminal proceeding against him\ and \a pretrial suppression hearing is a critical stage.\
• finding that a defendant has the right to appear at a suppression hearing involving testimony
• holding pre-trial and in-court identification procedures subject to two separate inquiries
• \[A] defendant’s presence is not required ’[a]t a conference or argument upon a question of law.’\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).