Ninth Circuit· 4/14/1975
United States v. Robert Thomas Burke
Citations
- 506 F.2d 1165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- failure of defense counsel to read statement produced at close of government's case is not prosecutorial error.
- gun at issue found with gun linked to robbery by witnesses
- gun at issue found with gun linked to robbery by witnesses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trask, Sneed, Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennNinth Circuit· 1988-06-08· cited 273×
- United States v. John Edward Jones, A/K/A Liddy Jones, A/K/A Malik Shariff, United States of America v. Robert Avon Jones, A/K/A BobbyFourth Circuit· 1976-02-09· cited 154×
- United States v. Cyril T. HannaNinth Circuit· 1995-08-09· cited 147×
- United States v. Edwin Thomas BarrettNinth Circuit· 1983-06-07· cited 143×
- United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Lawrence Peters, and Jacek OdonerSeventh Circuit· 1986-05-20· cited 135×
- United States v. Thomas Rettig, United States of America v. Gary NowakNinth Circuit· 1979-01-25· cited 132×
- United States v. Marvin Jose RamirezNinth Circuit· 1979-11-20· cited 89×
- United States v. GrunsfeldSixth Circuit· 1977-10-03· cited 75×
- United States v. Gary Thomas ButcherNinth Circuit· 1977-07-15· cited 74×
- United States v. Willie Calhoun, A/K/A Calvin CalhounSixth Circuit· 1976-11-02· cited 73×
- United States v. Thomas Charles KellyEighth Circuit· 1976-01-27· cited 65×
- United States v. Ernest James CollinsNinth Circuit· 1977-10-17· cited 40×
- United States v. ShoherS.D. New York· 1983-01-21· cited 40×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jay Franklin VOUGHT, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1995-11-16· cited 36×
- United States v. Curtis Lee Peoples, A/K/A Tyrone OwensFourth Circuit· 1984-11-30· cited 35×
- United States v. Phillip John EllsworthNinth Circuit· 1981-09-15· cited 25×
- United States v. Cecil RobinsonSecond Circuit· 1976-11-01· cited 22×
- United States v. Gregory Richard BarkerNinth Circuit· 1993-03-09· cited 16×
- Carpenter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1978-08-02· cited 13×
- United States v. Larry William PrattNinth Circuit· 1976-01-26· cited 5×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 1,576×
- Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,012×
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 878×
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court· 1969-01-20· cited 547×
- Giordano v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 284×
- Billy Maurice Ogden v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1962-06-20· cited 127×
- United States v. Joseph AmabileSeventh Circuit· 1968-04-26· cited 80×
- United States v. Tommie Louis Brown, United States of America v. Virgil David Swain, United States of America v. Robert Lee NoblesNinth Circuit· 1974-06-10· cited 66×
- United States v. Thomas Albert TrejoNinth Circuit· 1974-06-10· cited 40×
- Frank Martin Wilke v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1970-02-26· cited 26×
- United States v. Jack CohnNinth Circuit· 1973-02-13· cited 20×
- United States v. Joe Charles WaltersNinth Circuit· 1973-05-29· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.