United States v. Robert McQuilkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that § 841(a) is a “controlled substance offense[]”
• finding downward departures result in opinions jurisdiction to review the denial of a that are not precedential. The majority departure request based on physical asserts that this is due to the fact that impairment
• a court of appeals “lack[s] jurisdiction to review a refusal to depart downward when the district court, knowing it may do so, nonetheless determines that departure is not warranted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).