Skip to main content
· 1/7/1992

United States v. Olando Johnson

Citations

  • 953 F.2d 110
  • 1991 WL 269092

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the “substantial intuitive appeal” of applying a circumstance-specific approach to instant offenses but nonetheless concluding that the approach “must . . . be rejected”
  • noting the conflict among the Circuits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Sprouse, Merhige, Eastern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.