United States v. Robert Jenning

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ '[G]aps in the chain ... normally go to the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility.' \ (quoting United States v. Lott
• explaining that “control over assets alone is insufficient, the [defendant] must have had control over at least one other par- ticipant in the criminal activity”
• stating a defendant need only manage or supervise one other participant for the enhancement to apply
• applying Demarest’s analysis of Santos in a mail and wire fraud case
• “control over assets alone is insufficient, the [defendant] must have had control over at least one other participant in the criminal activity”
• “It is clear that con- trol over assets alone is insufficient, the individual must have had control over at least one other participant in the criminal activ- ity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).