United States v. Daniel McKinley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the sentence was substantively reasonable regardless of whether the court imposed it as (a) an upward depar- ture based on the defendant’s extensive criminal history or (b
• affirming an above-guideline 125-month sentence in part because it was well below the 240-month statutory maximum
• “[A]s with other alleged constitutional errors, specifically errors of the Ap- prendi variety, the failure to make a timely objection results in this [c]ourt’s application of plain error review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).