United States v. Khanani

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a wide-sweeping, keyword-based computer search reasonable where the defendants failed to “cite any binding case law that would lead us to conclude the procedures used in this case infringed defendants’ Fourth Amendment rights”
• “No reversal will result if sufficient evidence uninfected by any error supports the verdict, and the error did not have a substantial influence on the outcome of the case.”
• district court did not abuse its discretion where extrinsic evidence was merely juror’s own observation of defendant’s behavior and where no one “contacted [juror] with any message or directive”
• “[P]rior in- consistent statements of a witness are admissible to impeach that witness.”
• absence of written search protocol did not render the search warrant overbroad

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).