United States v. Kim Darby Saenz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a 68 percent (or eleven level) departure was unreasonable and noting that a 50 percent (or eight level) departure would be extraordinary
• holding that a 68 percent (or eleven level) departure was unreasonable and noting that a 50 percent (or eight level) departure would be extraordinary
• holding that a 68 percent (or eleven level) departure was unreasonable and noting that a 50 percent (or eight level) departure would be extraordinary
• concluding a 68% substantial assistance downward departure (eleven offense levels) was “excessive and unreasonable under the circumstances”
• implying that any combination of listed activities set forth as examples would represent more substantial and extensive assistance than the cooperation present
• holding a departure unreasonable after reviewing the district court’s reasons for the extent of the departure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).