United States v. Robert Atkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taped conversations between defendant and co-conspirator, though using “veiled language and Delphic references” provided adequate basis for admission of co-conspirator’s statements
• statement inadmissible in part because made after plea bargain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).