United States v. James M. Albert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court properly admitted the certificate under the business-records exception, Fed. R. Evid. 803(6)
• holding Rule 804(b)(3) inapplicable to statement at sentencing allocution where defendant’s purpose was to “help [himself], not to be sentenced to a longer term of incarceration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).