Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 5/30/2012

United States v. Gantt

Citations

  • 679 F.3d 1240
  • 2012 WL 1942085
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10885

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because all four requirements [of plain error] must be met, the failure of any one will foreclose relief and the others need not be addressed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, O'Brien, Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Gantt

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.