Ninth Circuit· 1/16/2007
United States v. Ramirez
Citations
- 473 F.3d 1026
- 2007 WL 92629
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e have been willing to aggregate the facts known to each of the officers involved at least ‘when there has been communication among agents.’”
- “[W]here one officer directs another to take some action, there is necessarily a ‘communication’ between those officers, and they are necessarily functioning as a team.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kozinski, O'Scannlain, Bybee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harper v. City of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2008-07-14· cited 924×
- Torres v. City of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2008-11-12· cited 236×
- United States v. MassenburgFourth Circuit· 2011-08-15· cited 135×
- United States v. Katrina LyonsSixth Circuit· 2012-07-25· cited 117×
- United States v. Aaron WilliamsSeventh Circuit· 2010-10-25· cited 91×
- United States v. ChavezTenth Circuit· 2008-07-29· cited 81×
- United States v. PickelTenth Circuit· 2017-07-18· cited 42×
- United States v. Mark FowlkesNinth Circuit· 2015-09-28· cited 36×
- United States v. VillasenorNinth Circuit· 2010-06-10· cited 33×
- United States v. Iev, Juvenile MaleNinth Circuit· 2012-11-28· cited 32×
- United States v. WhitfieldThird Circuit· 2010-12-06· cited 32×
- United States v. Hector Magallon-LopezNinth Circuit· 2016-03-31· cited 32×
- United States v. VázquezFirst Circuit· 2013-07-18· cited 22×
- Ochoa v. CampbellE.D. Washington· 2017-07-31· cited 12×
- LOHARSINGH v. City and County of San FranciscoN.D. California· 2010-03-11· cited 11×
- United States v. Christian EstrellaNinth Circuit· 2023-06-06· cited 11×
- Randon Miller v. City of ScottsdaleNinth Circuit· 2023-12-08· cited 11×
- United States v. GorhamD.C. Circuit· 2018-08-06· cited 10×
- Tenorio-Serrano v. DriscollD. Arizona· 2018-07-05· cited 9×
- United States v. VazquezFirst Circuit· 2013-07-18· cited 8×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 2,340×
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court· 1971-03-29· cited 1,845×
- Devenpeck v. AlfordSupreme Court· 2004-12-13· cited 1,825×
- Illinois v. AndreasSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 626×
- United States v. ShareefTenth Circuit· 1996-11-13· cited 325×
- United States v. Anthony Ruiz Del VizoNinth Circuit· 1990-11-08· cited 207×
- United States v. Marco BurtonThird Circuit· 2002-04-29· cited 174×
- United States v. Aguero-MirandaFifth Circuit· 1999-12-29· cited 159×
- United States v. William John Sutton, United States of America v. Freddie Goldbaum Ortiz, United States of America v. Valentine Frank ProitteNinth Circuit· 1986-07-22· cited 148×
- United States v. Steven Linwood RobinsonNinth Circuit· 1976-06-16· cited 143×
- United States v. Howard Dale Bernard, Gordon Rae Childress, Sammy Brice Brock, Roger Lee Bard, Russell Richard CochranNinth Circuit· 1980-04-28· cited 117×
- United States v. Douglas JensenNinth Circuit· 2005-10-06· cited 113×
- United States v. Darrell Paul Bertrand, United States of America v. John Owen RapaeNinth Circuit· 1991-02-15· cited 108×
- United States v. Ruel Antonio WallaceNinth Circuit· 2000-07-07· cited 101×
- Robin Lynn Bailey v. Anthony Newland, WardenNinth Circuit· 2001-08-31· cited 96×
- United States v. Mark Lamond WillisNinth Circuit· 2005-12-19· cited 77×
- United States v. Roberto RodriguezSeventh Circuit· 1987-10-02· cited 76×
- United States v. Leon Angel ValenciaNinth Circuit· 1994-05-17· cited 72×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.