Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 11/4/2003

United States v. Ramirez

Citations

  • 348 F.3d 1175
  • 62 Fed. R. Serv. 1173
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 22676
  • 2003 WL 22481803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The specific ground for reversal of an evidentiary ruling on appeal must . . . be the same as that raised at trial.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • failure to object to testimony as expert opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Anderson, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.