Skip to main content
· 1/5/2005

United States v. Munro

Citations

  • 394 F.3d 865
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 124
  • 2005 WL 19502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant “took a substantial step towards completion of the crime by actually going to the prearranged meeting place”
  • explaining that § 924(c)(3)(B) determination is a \legal conclusion\ and applying categorical analysis
  • explaining that § 924(c)(3)(B) determination is a “legal conclusion” and applying categorical analysis
  • finding no entrapment jury instruction was warranted where the government offered a chance to back out of the potential crime
  • sexual abuse of a minor is a crime of violence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Anderson, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.