· 7/18/2002
United States v. Rafer Harrison
Citations
- 296 F.3d 994
- 59 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1086
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14496
- 2002 WL 1584309
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]o affirm the district court’s ruling, we may decide to consider all the evidence at trial, including evidence not presented at the hearing on the motion in limine.”
- “[A] prior opinion cannot stand as precedent for a proposition of law not explored in the opinion, even when the facts stated in the opinion would support consideration of the proposition.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seymour, Baldock, Hartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.