Tenth Circuit· 5/5/1993
United States v. Darryl Farley
Citations
- 992 F.2d 1122
- 36 Fed. R. Serv. 1304
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10293
- 1993 WL 139792
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- admitting statements of five-year old though one statement was made two hours after the assault and the other at least 12 hours after the assault
- affirming the use of remote live testimony under both § 3509(b)(1)(B)(i) and 18 United States v. MCCOLLUM, No. 02-0474/AF (ii)
- considering, in applying predecessor Rule 803(24), how close in time hearsay statements were made to alleged abuse
- one of out-of-court statements of abused child admitted where statement “was clearly not offered for the truth of the matter asserted”
- “Rule 703 would allow the expert to testify regarding the information, even if the evidence would not otherwise be admissible.”
- five year old victim’s youth and use of “childish terminology” when describing abuse considered in support of reliability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ebel, Godbold, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2003-06-24· cited 139×
- State v. KelleyUtah Supreme Court· 2000-05-02· cited 123×
- United States v. Matthew Wayne TomeTenth Circuit· 1995-07-31· cited 122×
- United States v. Dwayne A. WashingtonD.C. Circuit· 1997-02-21· cited 108×
- United States v. PabloTenth Circuit· 2012-09-06· cited 102×
- United States v. Anita YatesEleventh Circuit· 2006-02-13· cited 76×
- United States v. DonaldsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2003-07-15· cited 76×
- Garrett v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2001-06-19· cited 75×
- United States v. SmithTenth Circuit· 2010-06-03· cited 73×
- United States v. Ruben Dean LedfordTenth Circuit· 2006-03-27· cited 64×
- State v. Aaron L.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-02-15· cited 59×
- United States v. CassTenth Circuit· 1997-10-15· cited 49×
- United States v. John T. HefferonFifth Circuit· 2002-12-09· cited 48×
- State of Iowa v. Zachariah J. RogersonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2014-10-24· cited 48×
- United States v. Rafer HarrisonTenth Circuit· 2002-07-18· cited 47×
- People v. BroditCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-03-05· cited 35×
- State v. YamadaHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-12-24· cited 35×
- United States v. Norcees Ben CarrierTenth Circuit· 1993-12-21· cited 31×
- United States v. PabloTenth Circuit· 2010-11-16· cited 29×
- State v. T. MercierMontana Supreme Court· 2021-01-26· cited 27×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 2,639×
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
- United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 1980-10-24· cited 419×
- Morgan v. ForetichFourth Circuit· 1988-05-17· cited 247×
- United States v. LoveFourth Circuit· 1985-07-03· cited 189×
- United States v. Eneas Lavern NickNinth Circuit· 1979-10-18· cited 177×
- United States v. Steven D. MartinSixth Circuit· 1990-04-16· cited 120×
- Parsons v. Honeywell, Inc.Second Circuit· 1991-03-29· cited 100×
- Elton John Myatt v. Robert Hannigan and the Attorney General of the State of KansasTenth Circuit· 1990-08-01· cited 29×
- Sandra Lee Hickok, A/K/A Sandra Leigh Hickok v. G. D. Searle & Company, a CorporationTenth Circuit· 1974-05-01· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.