United States v. Darryl Farley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• admitting statements of five-year old though one statement was made two hours after the assault and the other at least 12 hours after the assault
• affirming the use of remote live testimony under both § 3509(b)(1)(B)(i) and 18 United States v. MCCOLLUM, No. 02-0474/AF (ii)
• considering, in applying predecessor Rule 803(24), how close in time hearsay statements were made to alleged abuse
• one of out-of-court statements of abused child admitted where statement “was clearly not offered for the truth of the matter asserted”
• “Rule 703 would allow the expert to testify regarding the information, even if the evidence would not otherwise be admissible.”
• five year old victim’s youth and use of “childish terminology” when describing abuse considered in support of reliability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).