Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 10/31/2014
United States v. Quick
Citations
- 74 M.J. 517
- 2014 CCA LEXIS 823
- 2014 WL 5488175
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Just as a single word cannot be read in isolation, nor can a single provision of a statute.”
- defining and employing this statutory construction principle
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thielemann, Usmc, Authority, Commanding, Wing, Miramar, Diego, Staff, Recommendation, Ltcol, Hams, Mitchell, Fischer, Ward
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2015-08-11· cited 28×
- United States v. Specialist CEY BRISTOL J. WILLIAMSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals· 2016-03-30· cited 10×
- United States v. UriosteguiNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2016-09-29· cited 10×
- United States v. LasterNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2017-01-27
- United States v. QuickNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2018-03-30
- United States v. PageNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2021-02-10
- United States v. SpeightNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2021-03-30
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-11-01· cited 2,703×
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 1,846×
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court· 1932-02-23· cited 1,799×
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-08-09· cited 1,468×
- Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 1,452×
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1986-08-18· cited 1,442×
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 720×
- United States v. MoffeitCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-04-03· cited 334×
- Andrus v. Glover Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1980-05-27· cited 329×
- United States v. CliftonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1992-08-28· cited 131×
- United States v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2011-08-30· cited 129×
- United States v. MarcumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2004-08-23· cited 113×
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2007-06-13· cited 90×
- United States v. KickUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1979-06-18· cited 85×
- United States v. BuberCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-03-16· cited 84×
- United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1998-09-10· cited 82×
- United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2010-03-04· cited 79×
- People v. NicholsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-09-25· cited 66×
- United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2003-06-23· cited 64×
- United States v. GoingsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2013-05-23· cited 58×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.