Supreme Court· 5/27/1980

Andrus v. Glover Construction Co.

Citations

446 U.S. 608
100 S. Ct. 1905
64 L. Ed. 2d 548
1980 U.S. LEXIS 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

referring to “canon that expressing one item of a commonly associated group or series excludes another left unmentioned”
relying on the interpretive canon that where a broad statutory term includes enumerated exceptions, courts should not imply unwritten ones
“Where Congress explicitly enumerates certain exceptions to a general prohibition, additional exceptions are not to be implied, in the absence of a contrary legislative intent.”
where statute specifically enumerates certain exceptions, additional exceptions are not to be implied, absent a contrary legislative intent
where Congress explicitly enumerates certain exceptions to a statute, additional exceptions are not to be implied
“Where Congress explicitly enumerates certain exceptions to a general prohibition, additional exceptions are not to be implied, in the absence of evidence of a contrary legislative intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

251 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Andrus v. Glover Construction Co.

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.