Andrus v. Glover Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to “canon that expressing one item of a commonly associated group or series excludes another left unmentioned”
• relying on the interpretive canon that where a broad statutory term includes enumerated exceptions, courts should not imply unwritten ones
• “Where Congress explicitly enumerates certain exceptions to a general prohibition, additional exceptions are not to be implied, in the absence of a contrary legislative intent.”
• where statute specifically enumerates certain exceptions, additional exceptions are not to be implied, absent a contrary legislative intent
• where Congress explicitly enumerates certain exceptions to a statute, additional exceptions are not to be implied
• “Where Congress explicitly enumerates certain exceptions to a general prohibition, additional exceptions are not to be implied, in the absence of evidence of a contrary legislative intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).