Supreme Court of Delaware· 1/31/1992
Mayes v. State
Citations
- 604 A.2d 839
- 1992 Del. LEXIS 87
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Sentencing courts are specifically entitled to rely upon information regarding other, unproven crimes.”
- requiring evidence have a minimal indicia of reliability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horsey, Moore, Walsh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
141 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court· 1999-03-11· cited 399×
- Kurzmann v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-07-13· cited 163×
- Fink v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2003-02-21· cited 88×
- Siple v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1997-10-06· cited 58×
- Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-04-22· cited 34×
- Cruz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-02-19· cited 26×
- Walt v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-03-04· cited 21×
- Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2004-11-09· cited 20×
- Colon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-05-12· cited 14×
- State v. CohenSuperior Court of Delaware· 1993-06-30· cited 13×
- Benton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1998-06-29· cited 12×
- Speaks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-10-30· cited 8×
- Wynn v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-06-27· cited 8×
- Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-10-13· cited 4×
- Martini v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2007-12-21· cited 4×
- Vessels v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-12-16· cited 3×
- VANDERHOEVEN v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-07-07· cited 2×
- Eaton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1997-12-08· cited 2×
- Baylis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-01-14· cited 1×
- Santiago v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-01-15· cited 1×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1972-01-11· cited 2,508×
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court· 1948-06-14· cited 1,667×
- United States v. Kikumura, YuThird Circuit· 1990-12-05· cited 454×
- Williams v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1959-03-30· cited 452×
- United States v. John Christopher DoyleSecond Circuit· 1965-10-11· cited 288×
- United States v. Carmine Fatico, and Daniel FaticoSecond Circuit· 1978-06-12· cited 249×
- United States v. Janice Weston, A/K/A Janice WallaceNinth Circuit· 1971-09-03· cited 229×
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Gary Bowdach, Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1977-11-28· cited 199×
- United States v. Herbert BaylinThird Circuit· 1982-12-30· cited 149×
- United States v. Martin SweigSecond Circuit· 1972-01-12· cited 142×
- United States v. Apolonia Galvan, A/K/A Paula GalvanFifth Circuit· 1991-12-18· cited 108×
- United States v. Fritznel Reme and Fritz PierrotEleventh Circuit· 1984-08-09· cited 99×
- United States v. Juan Manuel IbarraNinth Circuit· 1984-07-16· cited 98×
- United States v. Arthur NeedlesSecond Circuit· 1973-01-11· cited 93×
- United States v. Eliseo Espinoza, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1973-07-03· cited 88×
- State v. HueySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-03-11· cited 86×
- United States v. Steven Max SafirsteinFirst Circuit· 1987-12-02· cited 82×
- Valdez v. California Selective Service Local Board No. 44Supreme Court· 1973-04-02· cited 81×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.