United States v. Phillip Ray Jeter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s unlawful disclosure of secret grand jury testimony was “merely another type of ordinary criminal communication in a conspiracy that has been traditionally found undeserving of any First Amendment protection”
• concluding that 18 U.S.C. § 1503 was not vague or overbroad because “[t]he reach of the statute is clearly limited to such constitutionally unprotected and purportedly illicit activity as that undertaken by [the defendant] . . .”
• \one must impede the due administration of justice with the general intent of knowledge as well as the specific intent of purpose to obstruct\
• statute limited to those who “corruptly endeavor to interfere with the due administration of justice . . . is clearly limited to . . . constitutionally unprotected and purportedly illicit activity”
• construing 18 U.S.C. S 1503 (1982)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).