Skip to main content
· 7/31/1981

Fund for Constitutional Government v. National Archives and Records Service

Citations

  • 656 F.2d 856
  • 211 U.S. App. D.C. 267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rule 6(e) “counted” for these purposes because it was positively enacted by Congress
  • concluding that grand jury information protected from disclosure by Rule 6(e) is information “specifically exempted from disclosure by statute” within the meaning of Exemption 3 of the Freedom of Infor- mation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3)
  • explaining that “it is apparent” that “documents considered by the grand jury” fall within the “broad reach” of Exemption 3
  • finding that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) “is a relevant statute within the meaning of FOIA Exemption 3”
  • noting that an individual’s status as a public figure could weigh in favor of disclosure “under appropriate circumstances”
  • acknowledging that “high level government . . . officials” retain “legitimate and substantial privacy interests” in the context of law-enforcement investigations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGowan, MacKinnon, Gasch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.