· 7/31/1981
Fund for Constitutional Government v. National Archives and Records Service
Citations
- 656 F.2d 856
- 211 U.S. App. D.C. 267
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Rule 6(e) “counted” for these purposes because it was positively enacted by Congress
- concluding that grand jury information protected from disclosure by Rule 6(e) is information “specifically exempted from disclosure by statute” within the meaning of Exemption 3 of the Freedom of Infor- mation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3)
- explaining that “it is apparent” that “documents considered by the grand jury” fall within the “broad reach” of Exemption 3
- finding that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) “is a relevant statute within the meaning of FOIA Exemption 3”
- noting that an individual’s status as a public figure could weigh in favor of disclosure “under appropriate circumstances”
- acknowledging that “high level government . . . officials” retain “legitimate and substantial privacy interests” in the context of law-enforcement investigations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGowan, MacKinnon, Gasch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.