· 1/24/1974
United States v. Peter Dornau
Citations
- 491 F.2d 473
- 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10401
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the reading of immunized testimony was a use
- the reading of immunized testimony was a use
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waterman, Feinberg, Gurfein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.