Skip to main content
· 4/14/1976

United States v. Harry Kurzer

Citations

  • 534 F.2d 511
  • 37 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1269
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 11805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[t]he Fifth Amendment, in contrast, is by its terms an exclusionary rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Feinberg, Wyzanski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.