Skip to main content
· 9/30/1976

United States v. William Allan Jones

Citations

  • 542 F.2d 661
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • involving a claim that a husband intercepted the telephone communications of his estranged wife
  • upholding district court’s pretrial dismissal of indictment because “[t]he facts surrounding the alleged offense were virtually undisputed and trial of the substantive charges would not substantially assist the Court in deciding the legal issue raised by the motion to dismiss the indictment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Celebrezze, Lively, En-Gel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.