United States v. Michael Ely

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an argument that the district court should have balanced the § 3553(a) factors differently is “beyond the scope of [this Court’s] appellate review”
• stating that a defendant’s request “to balance the factors differently from the district court . . . is simply beyond the scope of . . . appellate review”
• confirming that a defendant’s request for the appellate court to balance the § 3353(a) factors differently than the district court is “simply beyond the scope of our appellate review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).