United States v. Gary D. Bollin, United States of America v. Ernst N. Tietjen, United States of America v. James Gormley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant waived the attorney-client privilege as to certain transactions and communications with his attorney where he testified “before the grand jury pursuant to a subpoena” about the same
• holding that the defendant waived the attorney-client privilege as to certain transactions and communications with his attorney where he testified “before the grand jury pursuant to a subpoena” about the same
• rejecting argument by defendant that he could not be ordered to forfeit funds in his individual retirement account that were insulated from garnishment by Georgia state law
• “[T]he finding of a single conspiracy must stand unless the evidence, taken in the light most favorable to the Government, would not allow any reasonable juror to reach such a verdict.”
• determining the same for a resti-tutionary order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).