United States v. Pangburn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the notice requirement found in Rule 41(d) is not required by the Fourth Amendment
• “[T]here was no prejudice to Salcido because the search of his storage locker would have taken place in exactly the same way if Rule 41 had been followed with regard to notice of the entry . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).