· 6/5/2007
United States v. John E. Howard, Iii, Christopher Restifo, Daniel Williams
Citations
- 489 F.3d 484
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12927
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- possibility existed where drivers were detained, but “confederates in another car, of whom the police were unaware, might have observed the police intervention and might drive the car away”
- automobile exception applies even though officers had up to sixteen hours to request warrant
- “If a car is readily mobile and probable cause exists to believe it contains contraband, the Fourth Amendment . . . permits police to search the vehicle without more.” (citing Pennsylvania v. Labron, 518 U.S. 938 (1996) (alterations omitted))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobs, Leval, Sotomayor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.