Skip to main content
· 6/5/2007

United States v. John E. Howard, Iii, Christopher Restifo, Daniel Williams

Citations

  • 489 F.3d 484
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • possibility existed where drivers were detained, but “confederates in another car, of whom the police were unaware, might have observed the police intervention and might drive the car away”
  • automobile exception applies even though officers had up to sixteen hours to request warrant
  • “If a car is readily mobile and probable cause exists to believe it contains contraband, the Fourth Amendment . . . permits police to search the vehicle without more.” (citing Pennsylvania v. Labron, 518 U.S. 938 (1996) (alterations omitted))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Leval, Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.