Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/15/1996
State v. Kern
Citations
- 914 P.2d 114
- 81 Wash. App. 308
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that it is reasonable to delegate search of bank records to bank employees, even when police officer was not present during the search
- indicating that it is reasonable to delegate search of bank records to bank employees, even when police officer was not present during the search
- noting that “police officer[s] will not ordinarily perform a search of a bank’s records, indeed may not be qualified to do so,” and that “[w]here a warrant is issued for specific bank records, delegation of the search to bank employees is not improper”
- upholding the search of bank records when the police officer, who was unqualified to search the records, allowed disinterested bank employees to conduct the search authorized by the warrant
- search upheld where police officer unqualified to search bank records allowed disinterested bank employees to conduct warranted search for defendant’s records outside of police supervision
- evidence not suppressed where officer dropped off warrant for bank records with bank employee, bank employees thereafter searched for the items listed in the warrant and mailed them to the officer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. SbordoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-05-01· cited 109×
- State v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-29· cited 38×
- United States v. Dale Robert BachEighth Circuit· 2002-11-18· cited 37×
- State v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-05-20· cited 34×
- State v. GrenningCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-01-08· cited 32×
- State of Washington v. Daniel BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-09-01· cited 25×
- State v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-01-29· cited 15×
- State v. EttenhoferCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-11-18· cited 12×
- State v. CardIdaho Supreme Court· 2002-04-12· cited 11×
- State v. TempleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-08-20· cited 10×
- State v. OllivierCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-04-18· cited 8×
- State of Washington v. Aaron L. LinderCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-10-13· cited 5×
- State v. AaseCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-05-04· cited 5×
- Bohanan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1999-11-26· cited 3×
- State of New Hampshire v. Christina FaySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2020-12-02
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-12-05· cited 657×
- State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-08-03· cited 71×
- United States v. Jeffrey Todd GerberEleventh Circuit· 1993-07-12· cited 57×
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 1993-05-20· cited 47×
- United States v. George Vernon Johns and Albert William HaberkornNinth Circuit· 1991-11-04· cited 45×
- United States v. Raymond M. Freitas, Walter Freitas, and Jonny E. McClellan DefendantsNinth Circuit· 1986-09-26· cited 37×
- United States v. Luther T. Pennington and Senator Harding ColbertTenth Circuit· 1980-12-03· cited 33×
- State v. CallaghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-03-01· cited 27×
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-02-17· cited 15×
- Morris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-21· cited 14×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1976-06-28· cited 14×
- State v. KlostermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-03-25· cited 14×
- People v. BoydNew York Supreme Court· 1984-03-28· cited 14×
- State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-11-23· cited 13×
- State v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-12-28· cited 12×
- State v. WraspirCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-07-06· cited 10×
- United States v. PangburnSecond Circuit· 1993-01-13· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.